“CHANGELING” The true story of Christine Collins

The true story of Christine Collins

The true story of Christine Collins

“CHANGELING”

TO FIND HER SON, SHE DID WHAT NO ONE ELSE DARED

A Boy Gone, a Mother Scorned


Toward the end of Clint Eastwood’s “Changeling,” in what is perhaps the only lighthearted scene in this rigorously somber film, Christine Collins, the heroine, is invited by some of her phone company co-workers, and then by her boss, to go out on the town and listen to the Academy Awards radio broadcast. The year is 1935, and “It Happened One Night” is Christine’s pick for best picture, but it’s hard to avoid interpreting this moment as a none-too-subtle wink directed at present-day moviegoers and Academy voters. Christine begs off — she just has too much work — and it goes without saying that on Feb. 22,Angelina Jolie, who plays her, will have to make similar excuses. She won’t be watching the Oscars with the likes of us; we’ll be watching her.

That seems to be the plan behind “Changeling,” at any rate, an ambition telegraphed a shade too blatantly in the many close-ups of Ms. Jolie’s extraordinary face, which is by turns tear-streaked, stoical, crestfallen and howling. To watch her trace Christine’s harrowing emotional passage — a series of flights from anxiety to terror, from grief to rage, pausing occasionally at calm defiance or tremulous hope — is to witness an undeniable tour de force of screen acting. It insists on being regarded as a great performance and may, indeed, be mistaken for one.

 

But something essential is missing, not only from her performance but also from the film as a whole. Announcing itself at the outset as “a true story” without the usual “based on” or “inspired by” hedge, “Changeling” is by turns fascinating and frustrating, emphatic and opaque. The truth about the case of Christine Collins is so shocking and dramatic that embellishment must have seemed pointless, but in sticking so close to the historical record, Mr. Straczynski and Mr. Eastwood have produced a distended, awkward narrative whose strongest themes are lost in the murky pomp of period detail.

In March 1928, Christine, a single mother living in Los Angeles, returns home from her shift supervising a busy switchboard to find that her young son, Walter (Gattlin Griffith), is missing. The initial response of the Los Angeles Police Department is casual and condescending, which turns out to be a chilly foretaste of worse treatment to follow. After a few months, with great fanfare and press coverage, the city’s hatchet-faced police chief (Colm Feore) stages a reunion between Christine and a boy who is evidently not Walter. When Christine points this out, she is treated first as a hysterical, traumatized woman and then as a lunatic and a threat to public order. She is ignored, smeared in the papers and then locked away in a mental hospital (where she meets Amy Ryan, who is to this movie more or less what Ms. Jolie was to “Girl, Interrupted”).

When it works best, “Changeling” is a feverish and bluntly effective parable of wronged innocence and unaccountable power. One after another, figures of supposedly benevolent authority — a police captain (Jeffrey Donovan), a pediatrician (Peter Gerety), a psychiatrist (Denis O’Hare) — turn out to be cruel and self-serving, and there are scenes that recall the relentless, claustrophobic sadism of “Rosemary’s Baby.” Unlike Mia Farrow’s histrionically helpless Rosemary, however, Christine has instincts that run more toward fight than flight, and she is aided in her darkest hour by a crusading Presbyterian minister (John Malkovich) and a square-jawed, patrician lawyer (Geoff Pierson).

When the focus is on Christine’s bureaucratic nightmare, Mr. Eastwood, who composed the film’s uncharacteristically intrusive score, orchestrates a steady crescendo of dread and indignation, with gothic elements lurking in the shadows of Tom Stern’s cinematography. Some of the performances — Mr. Donovan’s snappish arrogance, Mr. O’Hare’s cat-and-mouse sadism — seem overstated to the point of caricature, but to the extent that “Changeling” is a horror movie, such exaggeration makes sense.

But then, near the climax of Christine’s ordeal, another movie begins to take shape. The only decent man in the Los Angeles Police Department, a detective named Lester Ybarra (the excellent, blessedly understated Michael Kelly) begins to unravel the mystery of Walter’s disappearance. And as he does, “Changeling” itself comes unraveled. I don’t want to give too much away, but the truth is that the film spoils itself.

At around the 90-minute mark, all of the considerable tension and suspense drain away, and if the film ended at that point, you might walk away shaken and perhaps stunned. But when you look at your watch, you discover that almost an hour remains, during which the film lurches from one stagy set piece and from one genre to another, losing its focus and coherence in the process. The pervasive overacting makes less and less sense and becomes more and more annoying. There are courtroom showdowns and grisly flashbacks, prison house confrontations and further tearful reunions, as a leering serial killer (Jason Butler Harner) supplants the Los Angeles Police Department as the main source of violent, irrational depravity.

“Changeling” is especially disappointing because its basic story might have summoned forth another of Mr. Eastwood’s dark, masterly investigations of the implacability of evil and the difficulty of justice, like “Unforgiven” or “Mystic River.” But while those themes are certainly present, the director has not done much with them or succeeded in giving them dramatic shape or cinematic life. “Oscar-worthy” might turn out to be an accurate description of this baggy, grandiose movie — or, at least, of Ms. Jolie’s exhausting lead performance — but I’m afraid it would not be a compliment.

“Changeling” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has scenes of grisly violence and some profanity.

“CHANGELING”

Opens on Friday nationwide.

Directed by Clint Eastwood; written by J. Michael Straczynski; director of photography, Tom Stern; edited by Joel Cox and Gary D. Roach; music by Mr. Eastwood; production designer, James J. Murakami; produced by Mr. Eastwood, Brian Grazer, Ron Howard and Robert Lorenz; released by Universal Pictures. Running time: 2 hours 20 minutes.

 

IN THEATERS 24th OCTOBER, 2008

A CLINT EASTWOOD FILM

STORY -IMAGE -TRAILER

Changeling is an upcoming American period thriller set for release in 2008. The film is set in 1920s Los Angeles and is loosely based upon the real-life Wineville Chicken Murders. It tells of a woman who comes to suspect that the son returned to her after a kidnapping is not her own. It was directed by Clint Eastwood and written by J. Michael Straczynski. The film was produced by Imagine Entertainment and Malpaso Productions for Universal Pictures. Ron Howard was originally slated to direct, but scheduling difficulties and Universal’s desire to fast track the project led to his replacement by Eastwood.

Angelina Jolie stars in the lead role with support from John Malkovich, Geoff Pierson, Jeffrey Donovan, Jason Butler Harner, Colm Feore, Amy Ryan and Michael Kelly. Principal photography began on October 15 2007 and was completed in November 2007. Changeling is scheduled for general release in North America on October 31 2008 after a limited release beginning on October 24 2008. It premiered in competition at the 61st Cannes Film Festival on May 20 2008, where it received positive reviews. It appeared at the 34th Deauville American Film Festival, held September 5–14, and will have its North American premiere on October 4 2008 as the centrepiece of the 46th New York Film Festival, held September 26–October 12 2008, screening at the Ziegfeld Theatre.

 

PREMISE

PREMISE

Angelina Jolie and Clint Eastwood hold court at a press conference in Cannes for the premiere of “The Exchange”

The film’s screening at the 2008 Cannes Film Festival was met by “rave” reviews, prompting speculation it could be awarded the Palme d’Or .Damon Wise of Empire called the film “flawless”, and Todd McCarthy of Variety said Changeling was “Emotionally powerful and stylistically sure-handed”. He called it a “thematic companion piece” to Mystic River, but said it was “more complex and far-reaching” than Eastwood’s previous entry at the festival in 2003. McCarthy praised Jolie’s performance in the lead role as “top-notch”, saying her performance “hits home” more directly than in A Mighty Heart (2007) due to the absence of affectation. He also said the film offered “a wealth of sterling supporting turns”, praising Michael Kelly’s performance in particular. McCarthy expressed admiration for Straczynski’s “outstanding” script, which he said had “deceptive simplicity and ambition to it”, and he praised Eastwood’s direction, which he said honored the script by “underplaying the melodrama and not signaling the story’s eventual dimensions at the outset”. He said, “The characters and sociopolitical elements are introduced with almost breathtaking deliberation, as dramatic force and artistic substance steadily mount” and that “In the end, Changeling joins the likes of Chinatown and L.A. Confidential as a sorrowful critique of the city’s political culture.”

Kirk Honeycutt of The Hollywood Reporter said Changeling put aside romantic ideas of a 1920s Los Angeles being a more innocent period, saying the film portrayed a city “awash in corruption and steeped in a culture that treats women as hysterical and unreliable beings when they challenge male wisdom”. He said the story “adds a forgotten chapter to the L.A. noir of Chinatown and L.A. Confidential“. Honeycutt wrote that due to the film’s close adherence to the true-life facts of the case, the drama sagged momentarily at one point, but that “Straczynski and Eastwood are good at cutting to the chase. Seldom does a 141-minute movie feel this short”. Honeycutt praised Jolie’s performance, saying she “completely shuns her movie star image” and “can appear vulnerable and steadfast in the same moment… She reminds us that there is nothing so fierce as a mother protecting her cub”. He said the supporting characters (with the exception of Amy Ryan’s) “tend toward righteousness or badness without too many shades in between”. Honeycutt had praise for Eastwood’s “melodic” score that “evokes not only a period but also the mood of a city… undergoing galvanic changes” and that “the small-town feel to the street and sets, seeming oh-so-quaint to modern eyes, captures a society resistant to seeing what is really going on”.

Oliver Séguret of Libération said the cast was the best part of the film. He had praise for the “magnetic” performances of the supporting actors and called Jolie “intense but discreet… beautiful but never dazzling”. Séguret noted that instead of being a moving family drama, the film largely stayed outside this framework to concentrate on a portrait of a corrupt city. He said that while Changeling had no obvious defects, it was “perplexing” that other critics had such effusive praise for the film. He said that while Eastwood proved he was a capable director, and that he presented a solid recreation of the era, he never felt the director was inspired by the challenge the reconstruction posed. Séguret noted that Eastwood kept the story going like “smouldering embers”, but that it seldom burst into flames. He said the effect was like placing the viewer in the position of a passenger in a limousine with all the options and air conditioning: comfortable but a little boring.

CANNES 2008

Competition at the 61st Cannes Film Festival on May 20 2008

In the past five years Mr. Eastwood has enabled more first-rate, laurel-worthy acting than just about any other American filmmaker. There was Ken Watanabe in “Letters From Iwo Jima”; Ryan Philippe in “Flags of Our Fathers”; Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman (and Mr. Eastwood himself) in “Million Dollar Baby”; everybody in “Mystic River.” All of these actors, taking advantage of the director’s famously efficient, low-stress approach, were able to stretch out in the zone between realism and melodrama, to explore their characters’ raw nerves, tender spots and psychic calluses.

Ms. Jolie, in contrast, hurtles through “Changeling” as if it were the latest installment in the Lara Croft action franchise, sustaining a pitch of intensity that turns Christine at once into a vivid icon of suffering and something of a blur. The character, as imagined in J. Michael Straczynski’s script, is as flat as a nickel. Each side is stamped with the likeness of a familiar movie archetype,  victim of circumstance on one, crusader against injustice on the other , and Ms. Jolie composes her features and adjusts her voice accordingly when it comes time to flip.

    

 

WITH:

Angelina Jolie (Christine Collins),

John Malkovich (the Rev. Gustav Briegleb),

 Jeffrey Donovan (Capt. J. J. Jones),

Michael Kelly (Detective Lester Ybarra),

 Colm Feore (Chief James E. Davis),

Jason Butler Harner (Gordon Northcott),

 Amy Ryan (Carol Dexter),

Geoff Pierson (S. S. Hahn),

Denis O’Hare (Dr. Jonathan Steele),

Frank Wood (Ben Harris),

Peter Gerety (Dr. Earl W. Tarr),

Gattlin Griffith (Walter Collins)

and

 Devon Conti (Arthur Hutchins).

 

 

 


47 Responses to ““CHANGELING” The true story of Christine Collins”

  1. Soon in theaters.

  2. [...] “CHANGELING” A CLINT EASTWOOD FILM [...]

  3. Forget this reviewer’s opinion-this is a great movie and well acted by numerous actors and actresses-it is not an “Angolina Jolie vehicle” (she does a good job in it regardless of the reviewer’s opinion).

  4. I completely disagree with this review. In fact, in comparison to most of the garbage sold in theaters, this film was fresh, interesting and actually worth the money that my husband and I paid. I felt that Mr. Eastwood presented the story well onscreen and that the film unfolded like a book–more details present than in many films. When I left the theater, I actually had something to think about, in comparison to the pop culture pieces that woo the American masses today. I never felt the tension draining away or that the film “unraveled”. Save such reviews for “High School Musical,” and “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.” If the movie wasn’t perfect, at least it was intelligent and boasted decent acting.

  5. Great movie performance by Angelina Jolie in every sense of the word. She kept me completely compelled and focused on her every emotion throughout the captivating camera shoots. I found myself crying, frightened, laughing, entertained and just totally emersed throughout. I went to see the movie two (2) times, and could see it again and again. It had everything, I as a mother of an only son; that I could imagine in losing a child. There could be nothing more asked in her performance, and any other performance by the entire cast; as all were incredible.

  6. What a very witty and wrong review. I couldn’t believe how terrific this movie was. I was hypnotized, horrified, and entertained. I’m not easily entertained when it comes to “movie tricks” either… tired of the predictable or the over-the-top switcheroo plots, this was a gripping movie that seem to just uncover plain facts without much gloss at all.

  7. THis review is totally off the wall. The movie is absolutely a masaterpiece and Clint Eastwood should get his second Director’s Oscar for it. Go see it- it is about the only good movie of the year!

  8. This movie was the most moving performance by Jolie. It became so much more than a “movie” I was left in tears at the end. You had to feel for everyone. Heartbreak, frustration, anger and repulsion and some humor also. It has everything. Movie reviews are always so jaded and prejudiced I don’t see why people read them…shame! This brought up a subject I never knew about or had happended. Now I want to know more. Thank you.

  9. Very good movie. The movie is long, however, and there is at least one scene that could have been deleted without any loss to the film. I’m referring to the hanging scene. A relatively long scene that really has little to do with the message of the movie.

  10. This movie was amazing. Not one person got up to go to the bathroom or to get a refill, no one was talking everybody was just watching the movie.

  11. Obviously this viewer has his head stuck up his a..! Angelina captured my soul in this heartfelt story. This movie was very good and of substance. Worth my time and money. Thanks Clint! Nods to both.

  12. I agree with all of these commenters! This person who made this review has some type of grudge or something against the actors in this film or something. I completely disagree with this review. I thought the movie was very emotionally powerful throughout the whole movie. I would completely go see this movie again. This movie was terrific and I feel sorry for readers of this article not to go see the movie because of this aweful review. I hope they at least read to the end and read all the comments!

  13. Saw this film just yesterday and in my opinion it was very well written / directed and the acting was great. Staying so close to the truth is what makes the film so good. Also I did not find the film to be overly long. Critics… I certainly dont get them. See this movie, you wont be disappointed.

  14. I can’t believe someone actually did NOT like this movie. It was great, and Angelina Jolie supurb! Eastwood’s casting of her in this role was genius, as she has such a connection with children and would understand the plight of Christine Collins.It was not overdone. Oscar worthy movie, actress, director, etc.

  15. Like everyone else I COMPLETELY disagree with this review. I saw this movie last night and although before I was not a huge fan of Angelina Jolie, I am now convinced she is a very good actress. I was very moved by her performance and I am glad I saw it when the theater was relatively empty so as not to be distracted by others!

  16. Amazing movie. The raw human emotion was palpable. The actors did an incredible job. I hope more people go see this film. John Malkovich was so great in this role. Great film, well written, and of course perfectly directed by the master.

  17. i so disagree with this review. i saw this movie the other night and was so moved by it that i had a hard time sleeping that night. i just couldn’t believe this story actually happened..but it did and its so great that this movie was made so that such an amazing story of one woman’s courage & persistence would not be forgotten. i thought the acting was excellent..i was never a fan of angelina jolie till i saw this movie.

  18. i also disagree with this review…this movie was so moving,i also could not sleep…i found myself constantly thinking about christine collins..angelina jolie is a warm person and it came through in her roll as christine collins..its was an amazing story..i would love to see it again….

  19. Hi to everyone that liked this movie,I am still waiting to go and watch it, because where I live we watch the film a week or 2 after the other countries.I am a great fan of Angelina Jolie, and most of the films that she did I saw part of my life in each film. I am waiting to go and see this film because even in this film there is part of my life in this movie.I will take also my daughter to watch after I will go to watch first without her.than I will sit down and talk to my daughter,and explain to her that what they did back than to Christine Collins it happened to me in the 90′S,I suffered a lot,but with great humility I walked with Love and kindness and I will pray for forgiveness even to those who put me through hell.I pray so no one will taste what I have been trough.So please respect all the people who did this film,and SPECIAL thanks go to Angelina Jolie.

  20. [...] “CHANGELING” The true story of Christine Collins [...]

  21. I also disagree with the reviewer of this article. The movie was intense, well-direcrted, and the acting was sensational, especially by Jolie. I left the movie feeling like my entire insides had been jolted. You will not be able to get through it without tearing up at times. Please, please, please, if you have not seen it, go by the posters and their opinions rather than a very nasty reviewer with poor judgement who seems to have it in for Jolie and Eastwood.

  22. Reading this review and everyone who replied to it, actually reminded me somewhat of the film. I recently saw this movie and was compelled to do a little research of my own. Then, I came upon this review. The entire time while I was reading it, I couldn’t help but think of the LAPD portrayed in the film and the corruption involved. This review was completely off in portraying the film, the actors, and the amazing story of it all. It seems that the author either likes those glamed up american films so much that they would corrupt a reader into believing that this film is anything other than amazing. The entire time I read this review, I had been hoping that someone, even one person would contest against this horrendous offense. And then I saw all the comments doing just that. Just like in the film, the public went against something so wrong it was funny. Please, if you haven’t seen this film, go see it!

  23. The reviewer has seen too many movies and mothered too little. The movie was one of the most excellent and tastefully done I’ve ever had the pleasure to watch. It was handled delicately, not overdone. It was handled with respect. It depicts a time when women coudn’t even own their own money if they married. And the corruption of the LAPD is fact, not fiction. Historical fact. Me. Eastwood did not dwell on the horrors of the ranch, but the the impossible walls thrown up against Mrs. Collins and the bravery of the Reverend, the lawyer, and a very decent, true detective.

    I think, reviewer, you have been outvoted by everyone who has watched the film. Jolie and everyone involved were splendid, and the direction was impeccable.

    Try being a mother. Personally, I’d have ripped heads off, but then this isn’t 1928 and now if your child is missing, you go to jail, you aren’t bamboozled. I think a bit of age experience would make your jaundiced eyes open a little.

    Most excellently and tastefully handled, all the way around.

  24. HI TO EVERYONE,I SAW THE FILM ON THE 9TH DECEMBER,I ENJOYED IT,BUT I NEED TO EXPRESS SOMETHING.WHEN THE KILLER WANTED TO EXPRESS HIMSELF,IN THE FILM TO CHRISTINE COLLINS, I BELIEVE THAT HE WANTED TO DO THAT,BUT AGAIN HE WAS GOING TO TELL THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH WILL SET US ALL FREE.IN MY OPIONION HE WAS TRETENED TO TELL THE TRUTH AND WAS PROMISED THAT HE WILL BE FREE.BUT AS WE KNOW HE OBEY NOT TO TELL THE TRUTH AND STILL HE GOT IT.I THINK THAT THE FILM WAS VERY GOOD,BUT THE TRUTH WAS KEPT AWAY FROM US,WHY BECAUSE THE KILLER HOLD TO SPEAK THE TRUTH.IN MY OPIONION THE KILLER WAS NOT THE KILLER BUT HE WAS FORSED TO KILL ALL THE BOYS LIKE THE WAY HEROD DID TO KILL JESUS.I BELIEVE THAT THE BOY OF CHRISTINE WAS LIKE JESUS,AND THEY DID LIKE HEROD,THEY TRETEND THE KILLER TO KILL ALL THE BOYS AROUND 10 YEARS OLD.SO WHEN THE KILLER WANTED TO TELL THE TRUTH THEY PROMISED HIM A FREE ROAD BUT THEY KILLED HIM THE SAME WAY,AND CHRISTINE COLLINS KEPT HERSELF WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH.I BELIEVE THAT SOMEONE USE TO KNOW THE TRUTH AND THATS WHY THE POLICE WHERE FORCED TO ACT THAT WAY.I FEEL SO SAD FOR THAT WOMAN,BUT ITS OK ONE DAY THE TRUTH WILL SET US ALL FREE. WANT TO THANK THE MOST BEAUTIFUL ACTRESS FOR PLAYING THE PART OF CHRISTINE COLLINS,SHE IS THE MOST BEAUTIFUL ACTRESS FROM OUTSIDE AND WITHIN.I WANT TO THANK AS WELL THE DIRECTOR CLINT EASTWOOD,BECAUSE HE WAS ONE OF THE GOOD ACTORS OF HIS TIME.MAY ALL THE GOOD ACTORS AND DIRECTORS,AND WRITERS WILL ALWAYS PASS TO US GOOD STORIES,SO WE WILL LEARN A LESSON.I AM HONOURED TO SAY THAT GOOD FILMS ARE MY CHURCH.THANKS TO YOU ALL.MAY THE POWER OF ABOVE WILL ALWAYS INSPIRE GOOD PEOPLE LIKE ANGELINA JOLIE TO HAVE THE COURAGE TO TAKE GOOD PARTS LIKE SHE IS DOING.I HAVE A SOFT SPOT FOR ANGELINA JOLIE,SHE IS TO GOOD,MAY SHE WILL ALSO GIVE HER BEST.BLESS YOU ALL.MIRIAM FROM MALTA.

  25. I have never felt so sad after watching a film. I wouldn’t recommend people to go & watch it only because the subject matter is so sad & awful, but the film was done brilliantly. If you don’t mind tears go & see it… The whole audience sat in stunned silence at the end.

  26. WOW. what a movie!!
    seriously though, this review is appalling.. did you even watch the film or what?

    angelina jolie’s performance is mindblowing, and any woman will understand her anguish as christina collins.. she portrays it so flawlessly.
    clint eastwoods’ has created another masterpiece. this one sure hits home, it’s so true and sticks to the facts unlike many of hollywood’s so called ‘based on a true story’ films.

    it’s superbly done. you will find yourself tear up inside at some of the scenes, and i don’t remember the last time a movie had that kind of impact on me.

    when this film ends, you find yourself staring blankly into space, in a daze. it hurts like this actually happened, and you find yourself feeling angry and confused.. one question keeps coming back to haunt you: WHY?

    trust me and all the other people who have commented.. go and see this film. you can’t afford to miss this one!

  27. CHANGELING IS ONE OF THE BEST MVIES IVE SEEN SO FAR. I WAS FILLED WITH ALL KINDA EMOTIONS AS I WATCHED. I AM IMPRESSED WITH ANGELINA’S ACTING, SHE IS AMAZING. THIS COMES AS NO SURPRISE. THIS MOVIE CAPTIVATED MY SOUL AND MIND. NO MOTHER SHOULD HAVE TO FACE WHAT CHRISTINE COLLINS FACED. GR8 WORT MR EASTWOOD. THE OSCAR WILL GO TO ANGIE

  28. I really hope the killer of Walter Collins will goes to Hell.
    The movie was superb and well cooked.
    Thanks to Mr Clint.

  29. The best movie my husband and I have seen in a very long time. One of the signs of a great movie is after seeing it, we couldn’t stop talking about it.
    Clint Eastwood is the cream of the crop IMHO.

  30. I also liked the movie but what I find interesting is that the review of the so called expert was so disagreed upon by all of us!
    What determines an expert or a qualified critique?

  31. This review is nuts. The movie was great-haunting, but great. I can’t get it off my mind. I, too, did some internet research and I think it portrayed Christine Collins and her story very well. I have great compassion for her and could not imagine the horror she felt each day she opened her eyes. God bless her and protect all of us and our children from such horrific incidences.

  32. I just saw this movie. I found it extremely harrowing to watch, but it’s an excellent movie. I checked into the story of Christine Collins afterward, and the only truly significant thing left out of the film was the role of Northcott’s equally depraved and insane mother in the Wineville murders.
    I failed to notice any overacting! As for “wallowing in period stuff”–what else can you do when a film is set in 1928? Have the Christine character working for a cell phone company?
    Dear Mr./Ms. reviewer, some advice–the next time you go to see a movie you would like to review, be sure not to get stoned first!

  33. The movie was superb and moving…it would touch anyone’s heart with a good storyline and heart wrenching moments of Mrs Collins in 1928.. It makes us realize too that our kids are so important to us..it brought tears to my eyes and I wept for those kids who were brutally murdered. Kudos to the actors and director.

  34. Looks like I’m the only one who agrees with the reviewer! I just finished watching the film. When I read this review, I looked for the reviewer’s name (didn’t find it) because I thought he/she really hit the nail on the head. I too found it to be overly long, and rather disjointed. Just when the mother dynamic was winding down, the movie took off in another direction – the murder aspect. And I could have done without the axe swinging parts – that really turned me off, and didn’t give me any clues to the murderer’s motive or psyche.

    By the way, I really like Clint, and found much of the movie to be very well done (as did the reviewer). It just had some significant flaws. So Mr/Ms. reviewer, take heart! Someone agrees with you – but we’ve sure been out-voted!

  35. i really disagree with this review!
    i got from it almost that the person believed it had nothing to do with the true story at all!
    i did some research on what really happened and the movie is pretty darn close to what really happened. (and trust me its just as horrifying and sad as the movie put across)
    i deisagree with the writer where they said that its only listed as a “true story” and how it should say “based on” or “inspired by”. since its so darn close to what really happened, it IS a true story.
    i thought the movie was amazing. Eastwood kept it in time period and didnt really touch it from there. he kept it all together. i agree with sandie, they wouldnt be able to “jazz” it up just so we would like it.
    it was difficult to watch because its a true story and some people refuse to believe this stuff really happens. but i really enjoyed it, even if it did creep me out for about a day afterwards.

  36. Honestly. WHAT A MOVIE!!
    It was excellent. I watched it last night with a friend that AHTES WATCHING MOVIES. He called me and said “Ill watch this movie again with you. Thats how good it is!”

    So yea, this review blows!

    Angelina’s performance was just as good as the movie. I loved the fact that Eastwood was able to portray both the story of Christine Collins and the Wineville Coop Murders.

    Quick question though. Was the end part of the movie true? Where it was said that Walter Collins escaped from the coop, and had to run back and try to free another boy? Or was that all fiction?

  37. [...] Wednesday 25 june, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt announced that their foundation  JOLIE-PITT donated $1 million to the Education [...]

  38. This is a very arrogant review. You are just one of the many ignorant reviewers that completely turn a blind eye to the true story behind the film. Do you believe that the real Christine Collins “overacted?” Is it even possible given her extraordinary circumstances? Taking the true story into account, I believe that Angelina Jolie underacted. Sure, this movie isn’t 100% accurate, but it sure comes close. What you are asking for is a 30% accurate film that is more entertaining than true. Maybe they should have left out Lester Ybarra’s part so that the audience is kept in suspense. Nevermind that some viewers might have already spoiled the movie for themselves by knowing the true story before-hand.

    You are not a bad reviewer by any means. I just suggest that you stick to reviewing films that aren’t based on true stories as your style is more suitable to fictional films. Changeling was a tremendous film that resulted in many people Googling Christine Collins. Too bad most of the sites that popped up are blogs with uppity, arrogant reviewers such as yourself. Remember, stick to reviewing fiction so that you can concentrate on fabricated plots. I bet your review of a Pearl Harbor movie would include a line like, “The movie spoils itself by revealing the only suspenseful moment in their trailers.”

  39. This movie was the most Intest movie I have ever seen. Im a 25 year old single mother and TRUE story behind this relates me more than Imaginable. After watching this movie I looked up the truth finding it to resemble my life. The intensity of this movie was very tramatic for me. I also think that the actors/actress were perfect for this movie. Regardless of the back talk about Joli being to pretty. ITS A MOVIE!! The point is not her looks its the tsory behind it. This also should teach EVERY parent to watch there kids better and to have a secret code with them if EVER a stranger comes to them. Feminist or not, This movie shows that the so called police and FBI the protectors of us are not always doing the right thing.

  40. Wow…I don’t believe you, the reviewer, and I watched the same movie, This movie was without a doubt the best I have ever seen. Ms. Jolie’s performance was gripping and outstanding. For me the mark of a great acting performance is when I forget that it’s “Angelina Jolie” up on screen, but a mother who is going through the nightmare of all loving mothers. BRAVO, Ms. Jolie, I have always been a fan, but now I am in awe.

  41. This was a fantastic movie, and the role of Christine Collins couldn’t have been played better by anyone else. Angelina Jolie did an amazing job, despite what this review says. This film moved me, which isn’t an easy thing to do. The point of this movie was the story behind it, not Ms. Jolie’s face. A couple of people focused on that, but not everyone. Some people actually watched it for THE STORY. Too bad to whoever wrote this review. You missed a fantastic movie.

  42. great movie! heart-warming, tear-jerker and inspirational, esp to all women…
    i just wish and pray that mother and son are together again in heaven..where they should belong..

  43. I disagree with this review completely. This movie was one of the best I have seen in years. It is a heartbreaking story and the acting was exceptional. Great job Clint Eastwood!

  44. powerful movie that bring s to life the the compounding horror and abuse that the corruption of the police on its civilains its supposed protect and the hope that some one can rise above itand finally get true justice. clint Eastwood has made an exellent movie.

  45. i loved this movie but i want to know the real story not the movie story..i want to find something like the book of her life and what she suffer trying to find her son until death…

  46. the best moveie i ever seen in a long time.

  47. Christine…

Leave a Reply